Skip Navigation



Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology Advance Access published online on July 29, 2009

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, doi:10.1093/arclin/acp031
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/3/201    most recent
acp031v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duff, K.
Right arrow Articles by McCaffrey, R. J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Duff, K.
Right arrow Articles by McCaffrey, R. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

On Becoming a Peer Reviewer for a Neuropsychology Journal

Kevin Duffa,*, Sid E. O'Bryantb, Holly James Westerveltc, Jerry J. Sweetd, Cecil R. Reynoldse, Wilfred G. van Gorpf, Daniel Tranelg and Robert J. McCaffreyh

a Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA
b F. Marie Hall Institute for Rural & Community Health, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock TX, USA
c Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown Medical School, Providence, USA
d Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University School of Medicine, Sacramento, USA
e Department of Educational Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, USA
f Department of Clinical Psychology, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, USA
g Departments of Neurology and Psychology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA
h Department of Psychology, University at Albany, State University of New York, New York, USA

* Corresponding author at: Deparment of Psychiatry, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, 1-308 MEB, Iowa City, IA 52242-1000, USA. Tel.: +1-319-335-6640. E-mail address: kevin-duff{at}uiowa.edu (K. Duff).


   Abstract

The peer-review process is an invaluable service provided by the professional community, and it provides the critical foundation for the advancement of science. However, there is remarkably little systematic guidance for individuals who wish to become part of this process. This paper, written from the perspective of reviewers and editors with varying levels of experience, provides general guidelines and advice for new reviewers in neuropsychology, as well as outlining benefits of participation in this process. It is hoped that the current information will encourage individuals at all levels to become involved in peer-reviewing for neuropsychology journals.

Keywords Professional issues; Statistical methods; Test construction

Accepted: June 11, 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.